Sunday, December 23, 2012

Maps, Menus, HUDs and Horror



              
  The topic of maps, menus, and HUDs is often overlooked.  They work best when you don’t have to think about them and we only really notice them if something doesn’t work.  They’re everything but officially invisible.  Like the Kuroko in Japanese theater.  They’re apparent to the audience but we ignore them.  No game reviewer talks about innovations in the menus or engaging maps.  It’s all about gameplay, story, and sound, not about the support tools.  But gamers are dependent on these tools. 

In average games they serve a unitary purpose:  Nothing more than easing the player along while they enjoy the game.  But with horror games they do more than provaying information and continuing themes.  They are a part of the fundamental gameplay and subtlety draw out the tension.  Normal action adventure games, like Zelda: Ocarina of Time, the HUD clearly displays what every button does, and life and energy levels, while the menus show slots for every item, and the maps are straight forward linear affairs with hot spots clearly marked.  The designers wanted the player to have an easy fun time diving right into the game.  As such, the information is straight forward, easily presented, and no frills. But horror games twist their layouts and mislead their players.  Fun is on the menu but the main dish is fear and the designers would rather not let the player get comfortable right from the start.
                The themes of survival are carried over to the support tools in these games.  The level design, instead of being linear, is winding, tangled, complicated by design.  This is naturally reflected in the maps.  In Resident Evil the map is laid out like standard blue prints.  This is true for many map designs; they want to convey a feeling of seriousness to gain the trust of the player.  The rooms are clustered together with no clue on the map as to which door is locked with what key.  This enforces exploration with no clear goals for the player to aim for.  Exploration is the only goal for the player at first.  Boss rooms, weapons, and key items are not highlighted.  You start looking for keys to unlock doors to look for some other little tid-bit to help you survive.  
The map doesn’t tip the player on which way to go or what’s in the rooms.  When the player enters a room their position isn’t revealed on the map but instead the room will flash.  The map does allow a kindness to the player, if there are still items in the room it will be colored red, otherwise the room is colored green.  But there is nothing to indicate if the room still contains key items or just an ink ribbon. 
Silent Hill uses the standard blue print design to help enforce realism, unlike the twisted Spencer Mansion; these are designed to look like real buildings.  This is to heighten the uncanny effect of the town of Silent Hill.  But despite its normal visage its level design is just as twisted as in Resident Evil.  With its jammed doors, blocked passages, and roads that have dropped off the face of the Earth, the normal map quickly transforms into a complicated series of passages. 

A quick aside:  One of the big things that sells the concept of a horror game is the setting.  If the setting and level design is realistic I can buy into the fantasy easier and suspend my disbelief.  Silent Hill is especially good at this because most of the Fog town Silent Hill is a spot on derelict town; roads and sidewalks at proper length, apartments with closets and bathrooms.  That is one of the things that pull me out of Resident Evil; there aren’t enough bathrooms or bedrooms for all those zombies.  A proper setting can be hard to create; you have to get all the big strokes down, like a livable home, and then all the fine details, this can go all over the place from toys in the kid’s room to the type of outlets used.  These little things stand out and help the player accept that this is a real place.  The contrast of monsters, gore, and decay really punch up the emotions.  If the player accepts that the location could be real, it’s the same as believing it is real, so it’s a small mental jump to say monsters are real also. 
But back to Silent Hill, James, and the other lead characters, will take notes on the map marking where passages are blocked or open.  He will also mark interesting points he finds along the way, whether a suspicious grandfather clock or save paints.  Here the realism of the map and level design plays in the designer’s favor.  An apartment complex or mall can be a very big place for the player to go through checking every nook and creny.  But the dilapidation twists the layout making a large portion of rooms inaccessible.  This works as an advantage to the narrative as well, it implies that the rooms you can access allowed you to open them, that there are clues in the rooms about your quest and about yourself.  Silent Hill is famous for its psychological bent.  The Other World sections of the game only further twist the layout.  Previous notes made on the map have been erased and the new layout may ignore doors, walls, whatever the proper layout was.  Spacious rooms are now narrow with makeshift rust stained walls.  The new notes on the map become the true map for these sections. 

I should also note there are a handful of sections without a map, like the building that’s under construction in Silent Hill 3, or the hand drawn map made by a child found in the church in the same game.  The no map sections work well when the player is on the run.  There’s something chasing them and they have no idea where to go.  Also to ratchet up tension; without a map you don’t know how many rooms you have or haven’t searched as the layout is usually very big, and overlooking just one health drink can be costly.  The child drawn map is unique as the layout is extremely wrong at first and as you go through you add notes.  The layout becomes extremely chaotic at this point, as it is near the end of the game.  Shape and size of the rooms are nothing like in the rest of the game this creates an erratic tempo.  There is a rhythm to level design.  Your character can only move at a set speed so the length of time in a room sets the tempo. 

The map design in Fatal Frame functions like a compromise between Resident Evil and Silent Hill.  It’s a fairly straight forward mansion but some doors are held shut by ominous forces.  As the nights progress different doors unlock or become locked, creating new paths.  This will correspond with the art design in game.  The mansion starts off extremely decrepit but rooms look more lived in as the night’s progress.  The recursive level design of horror games causes confusion in the player.  The map will show which doors the player can and can’t use and every night the map is whipped clean.  One thing that is fairly unique to Fatal Frame is that you can be attacked by ghosts in the save room, most other games use these as a safe area for your character.  Playing against expectations is highly effective.  With changing level design and misleading maps the player is confused and forced to use critical thinking which encourages survival.

The menus in horror games act as a main hub for gameplay and as a place for reprise for the player.  During stressful times of gameplay you can always pull up the menu and collect your thoughts.  Although some games use real time menu systems.  Resident Evil has three options for what you can do with your items; Examine, Use, or Combine.  Examining items gives clues to the story and hints on game play.  Use will either equip your item or just use it if it’s a healing herb.  And combine is useful for item puzzles.  Several of the items in Resident Evil are puzzles that can only be accessed through the menu.  Survival horror games tend to be heavily puzzle based.  And by having items act as puzzles it brings the central game play elements right to effect the outcome of the game, Silent Hill 2 increases the chances of the suicide ending if you examine the knife and the letter from Mary too much.  Silent Hill 3 needs you to use Heather’s locket to beat the boss at the end of the game, and the locket is an item you start with. 

Resident Evil use limited inventory as a sort of puzzle.  Limited inventory puzzles are an old adventure game trick, like The Uninvited.  A problem designers would find players would pick up every item and spam them on everything else to force the solution.  So, with limited inventory, and excessive items to choose from the player can’t so easily spam force the answer.  Here it serves a similar purpose but instead if just limited the amount of key items you can hold, it puts them in direct competition with your weapons, ammo, and health.  This is nice as it forces the player to choose between protecting themselves with their safety items or moving the game forward with key items.  Forcing the player to make difficult choices is a big fear inducer in horror games. 

Fatal Frame uses another system that isn’t too unfamiliar to horror games; RPG elements.  In Fatal Frame you only have the one weapon, the camera.  And in order to have the player stare down the ghosts the longest they assigned a points and reward system.  If you time your shots perfectly you can land a zero shot or a fatal frame shot, but these are the hardest to pull off and highest risk of being hit.  This really makes for a nerve wrecking points system.  But of course the stick works best with the carrot so rewarding the player by allowing them to spend their points on upgrading their camera.  Basic upgrades like increasing power, speed, size of capture circle and special ones like a super shot, freeze shot, slow shot, or turn visible shot.  It’s a mechanic that works well with the gameplay and story. 



The menu is also where files and life levels are shown.  Having the files in one location is convenient especially when they contain clues for puzzles, but they mainly serve to flesh out story, and occasionally explain game mechanics.  But the health displays unlike more common action adventure will be presented veagly.  In Resident Evil life is represented with simple labels “fine,” “medium,” “danger” and corresponding colors.  One troubling label is “poisoned” when poisoned you do not get to see your health level while it slowly drains; the only clue to your health level is your body posture.  Silent Hill keeps a screen shot of the paused game and it becomes red and staticy the worse your condition is.  Fatal Frame uses an easy to read life bar.  But it’s slightly more complicated than that, the enemies deal damage that varies greatly.  This vagueness of life levels keep the player in suspense.

The life levels displayed in the menus is one of the main differences in horror games.  Normal action adventure games would have that displayed on the HUDs.  Normal HUDs display all the useful information a player would want to have; life, ammo, energy, etc.  But most horror games have the HUD completely free of any thing.  This makes the experience more cinematic and immerse.  Some screens may flash red when hit or bits of blood or dirt may get flecked on the screen but they try not to stand out.  They instead imply health levels with the posture of the character.  The more damage they take the more they limp and the slower they move.  And since the characters already move slowly it can be quite debilitating to be critically hurt.  Naturally this helps encourages players to avoid the enemies.  This is the most effective design for the HUD, without any clue about your stats it keeps the player sharp, counting their shots and approaching enemies with caution.

As more horror games become more action oriented HUDs have been resurfacing.  Dead Space has a very ingenious design for its HUD; the life bar is imbedded in Isaac’s spine, ammo displayed on the gun, and the menu is projected in front of him and we as the player are only looking over his shoulder.  First Person Shooters still need a HUD as they can’t show the character’s body posture.  Fatal Frame uses both first and third person perspective.  In regular mode going around the mansion you are in 3rd person mode and in combat, when you raise your camera, you switch to 1st person mode.  This is very effective as the player is more empathetic from seeing the character in 3rd person.  Seeing the small vulnerable girl up against the big scary shots.  And then forced to combat, the camera changes and now the danger is in your face.  With the mechanic based around a camera it is very natural to switch between 1st and 3rd person.  Personally, it’s the only game I know that can do it without breaking immersion.
Something to keep in mind is the point of a horror game is to scare the player.  Most games simply strive to be entertaining but horror games are trying to create atmosphere.  Everything needs to contribute to create atmosphere, and this is where the subtle brilliance of the support tools shines.  These are the parts that work best.

The map acting as a puzzle.  The player will depend on the map to find the shortest and safest route.  This puts the player in the mindset for survival.  The misleading maps, like in Silent Hill, encourage exploration and put the player in an apprehensive mood.  When your only clue on where to go can’t be trusted you tend to step lightly.  This is extremely effective in setting the mood for the player.  Changing the original layout of the map to make a twisted one, makes the player second guess their movements.  This distrust in the map is vital for creating suspense.

In menus examining items encourages and enforces exploration.  By having items hidden in other items, like a key inside a book, and other items that are puzzles that can only be accessed through the menu, encourages players to examine all items for clues.  Examining your gun and first aid spray in Resident Evil reveals that both are made by the mysterious Umbrella Corp.  Hinting at the range of businesses they’re involved in.

Keeping the HUD clear from clutter makes the game play cinematic.  Without life and ammo levels displayed players are free from distractions and can be further engrossed in the game.  By not showing these it helps draw out tension.  On average, an enemy can kill a character in two or three hits.  Most of the games will have the enemies deal out various amounts of damage, light and heavy attacks, this adds to the stress of not seeing your health level.  Did the giant spider just poison me or just wound me?
One thing I’m surprised to find only used in one game is a screen saver.  In Fatal Frame if you let the game sit for a few moments the screen will begin to be covered with bloody hand prints.  This is especially effective as the game doesn’t feature much blood or gore.  Save items, like the ink ribbon, work very well making your character’s mortality into a commodity.  The Fatal Frame games all offer an infinite amount of the weakest film for your camera, as there are randomly generated enemies.  But the first game gives the illusion that there’s a limited amount of film as you can only restock up to 30 shots from any save point.  This is incredibly effective in stressing out the player as they believe they are on the verge of running out of ammo but it’s only a short distance from restocking. 

But not all mechanics work.  These are just some that either fail to work or breaks immersion.  One problem that is frequent in all sorts of games is the map layout spoiling a boss encounter.  Too often you’ll look at the map and find a large room with only one passage way that leads to it.  Maybe even a save point before entering the large chamber.  Anyone with any deductive reasoning can tell that there will be a boss fight.  This can be used for making the player anxious if it’s coupled with other bits of foreshadowing.  But too often a boss fight demands an arena against an over-sized behemoth.  This really doesn’t have to be the case.  There could be small bosses to in tight confiding areas.  Or play with the expectations of the player.  They’re use to having a boss fight in the massive last room in an area; the player will be dreading it the whole time.  How about once they arrive they find it empty maybe, even the key item just sitting there, baffled, the player will make their way to use that key but find a small chamber along the way now has a large boss in it.  As it chases you through the area it knocks down walls changing the layout of the level.  It finally finds an area to settle in and have a proper fight or maybe the destruction it causes leads to its demise.  Either way you now find yourself at the other end of the area, with a new level layout, maybe a few new enemies have been kicked up as well, all with the added burden of lugging around the key item.

One very annoying mechanic that pops up is real time inventory.  The concept is sound, if you need to get something out of your inventory the time you spend is still in play.  So if you need to get something while an enemy is in the room things can get hairy.  In games with online play or multiplayer this is required to have any menus and keep the systems in sync.  But they are extremely annoying.  Single player games with no online content have no reason to use this mechanic.  Left 4 Dead does deal with this very well; instead of pulling up a menu you only have four options on the D pad:  A quick and simple button press, no mucking about with choosing options. 

Another annoying mechanic that crops up is fetch quest overkill.  Fetch quests aren’t bad in moderation, properly paced out over the game, but some games don’t understand pacing.  Rule of Rose, for example will have you performing fetch quests at noisome for every non-combat section.  They have it set up where you select an item and set it for your dog to track and you then follow the dog as he leads you to that item.  What’s worse is the system is flawed on top of it.  There are several special items that need specific bait to find but you practically need to be in the same room for the dog to find them.  So you have to know in advance where the item is before you have your dog track it.  Brilliant.
Another thing that pops up are sanity meters.  These are completely counterproductive to trying to instill fear and creating a feeling of insanity.  The concept makes sense and works in the dice and graph paper games like Call of Cthulhu.  There you’re playing with a group and everyone needs to be clear on whose how insane.  But in the largely single player world of horror games they just create an ineffectual mechanic.  First; most games, like Amnesia and Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners, instead of showing any madness it just makes the screen go blurry.  What little this does, it at least encourages the player to not look at the monsters.  As keeping them mysterious is more effective at frightening the player.  At least it would if there was more correlation with what drives down the sanity meter and the effects.  Too often the screen blurs without any obvious trigger.  Unpredictable effects can add tension but this just comes off as annoying.  Having an easy to read meter show your sanity level completely undermines the concept of going insane.  Pre-scripted sequences of madness are far more effective. 

 In Silent Hill 2, James goes through a demolished building but it stands as he remembers it, doors that don’t lead to where they should, and goes down an impossibly long stair case, just to name a few of the mind bending things.  The game presents these fantastic elements with the same lack of fan fair as it presents the mundane.  Scripted sequences are the most ideal way of dealing with insanity; it allows the designers to control the pacing.  Eternal Darkness: Sanity’s Requiem is famous for its use of sanity meters.  Instead of just blurring the screen it creates interesting effects.  Camera angles changing, hearing enemies that aren’t there, seeing body parts fall off your character, and probably most famous the effects that break the 4th wall and messes directly with the player; saying it deleted your save files, having a fly on the TV screen, having the volume go way down.  These effects are entertaining at first but become a joke with repetition.  And the effects that break the 4th wall only further highlights that you are playing a game and break immersion.  These types of Meta effects may have worked better where the game acknowledges that it’s a game, like Nameshi no Gamu (the No Name Game) ultimately when trying to scare the player a sanity meter doesn’t work.  Randomly blurring screens are just annoyed and even cleverly designed effects only highlight that it’s all just a game.
But with the hinge sight of this report we can extrapolate what can be built upon for the future.  The use of screen savers has good potential.  It’s very surprising that they are not used as much.  But the trick to their effectiveness lies in handling it like a subtle jump scare.  Fatal Frame deals with a lot of torture and violence but it is not gory.  This is why the bloody hand print screen saver is so effective.  The game has set up blood as a taboo, only hinting at it in the game but when the screen saver kicks in it unabashedly breaks that taboo.  This is something horror games need to embrace for the future.  Setting up a taboo, giving the player comfort in expecting that taboo to be held up, and then break that taboo. It doesn’t need to be a screen saver, but it does take discipline to up hold a self-imposed taboo, but the moment the taboo breaks it really shocks the player. 

When sanity meters use Meta gimmicks to frighten players it ultimately highlights that you’re just playing a game.  But consider using Meta elements in something that already breaks the 4th wall… the menus.  The menus already directly address you as the player to choose to equip, examine, or use your item.  And through the repetition of checking your stats the menu becomes a safe haven for one to collect their thoughts.  This creates a perfect opportunity to betray that tranquility and directly scare the player.  This can be something subtle, like the background slowly changing or commands changing to personal attacks to the player:  Changing “use” to “fail” or “examine” to “kill yourself.”  One trick I believe would be highly effective is while examining an item, the item goes into a little display model animation, as the player watches the animation have something violent or horrible happens in the background.  Make it too fast for the person to see properly and it will really freak them out.  The description of old items mocking the player, possibly pointing out rates of failure.  Or have the changes be bold with shocking jump out scares.  Like introducing a new enemy that takes over the mind of the player and the menu is now where it manifests itself.  Items changing into something morbid or perverse.

Maps that don’t correspond to the level design or change with the level implying space is warping.  Every few rooms the map subtly changes leading you further into a maddening maze.  The important thing to keep in mind is stress versus annoyance.  Messing with the player should induce stress not annoy.  It can be a fine line between the two.  The only real way to find out is through play testing.

In closing maps, menus, and HUDs help to heighten the tension in the game through misinformation, withholding information, and controlling information.  The maps dispense misinformation, HUDs withhold information, and the menus control information.  The themes of horror game all branch out from survival.  The support tools demand from the player a level of critical thinking that most games lack.  Everything is difficult for the character.  You have to rely on your wits if you want them to survive.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Moving to China and Reviving This Old Blog

Well, tomorrow I leave for China and I hear facebook is blocked over there so I'm going to start this blog up again.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Light In Detail

First off sorry for not posting in here for so long but I just reciently got the internet again. But enough of that.

This summer I road my bike everywhere, this mainly consisted to and from work, but I road my bike everyday. I would ride the same route everyday and everyday I would notice something entirely new. Not only the strange people and events on the street, but like an entire building I've never seen before. This was always very remarkable to me. But one day while I was riding north on State the sun was shinning on everything in front of me and it eluminated every detail that could be seen. Even a mile or more ahead of me I could see the individual brick work in the buildings, the fixtures around the windows, I could even see into the windows and everything that was going on inside! This was a major thing I saw and I knew I had to figure out what I was seeing.

This photo fails to capture what I saw, but I realized then the nature of light. It's not, the more light the brighter things are, it's the more light the more details are revieled! Everyone should know how the basics of light works, light is produced by a source then is reflected off an object and into our eye. We have a limited range of colors that we can see so if we try and look into a source of light the details just kind of wash out into white color. White is the combination of all colors black is the absense of any color.

I, naturally, begain to apply this new lession to art. That if you have a character in the center stage with the lights on him bright then this one character should have the most details in him. But a trouble I find in my fields of comic books, illustration and animation is that all use very graphic styles of art. And that they mostly all dirive from ink on paper. In essense these images are nothing more then the colors black and white interplaying but never mixing. When trying to graphicly show shadows or value you do so with sold black marks (hatching, stipling, ect.) but unless you take a step away from graphic art and use an ink wash or paint you cannot create a natural shadow.

(image by Troy Nixey)

(image by Jason Reynolds)
The trouble is black is the lack of light, so your mind pegs it as shadow. And if you add a lot of detail to your main character and leave the back ground sparse, the main character will look "muddy" and heavy on the page while the background will draw your attention. This is a point that has been appled in reverse for years, where the main character is in less detail while the background has more. This way your eyes rest easily on the main character and advoid the white noise of the back ground.

(Tintin comics)
This is where the concept of light is bright, because when there is too much light thing tend to wash out and look simpler and blockier. It's really just there's more detail then we can precieve. The only way, it seems, to make your main character detailed you need to make the whole scene detailed. where you can use other tricks like color and line weight to distinguise the main character from the back ground.

(image by Geoff Darrow)

(image by Alex Ross)
Geoff Darrow and Alex Ross are two great comic artist that always put alot of details into every page. But their two style are strikingly different. Darrow's ink work tends to make the image look muddy as a whole, while Ross's paintings are very readable. rendering a scene for every pannel as Darrow and Ross do is a lugsury that most comic artist can't afford so many have to find differnt styles to push their work to higher forms. Choosing where to place details and leave them out is a very delicate process. But this is how many arist have made names for themselves.

(image by Frank Miller)

(image by Mike Mignola)
Frank Miller and Mike Mignola are two artist that really do good work with using light and not showing all the image. Both very graphic, I'm trying to stear away from painterly as graphic is most used. By seeing these piece you can tell that the artist knows what's in the blank areas from the amount of details around the edges. Here we see the principles of proportion and volum working their hardest. When they are in their right places we can assume as to what the blank areas are. Out of these two Mignola steps away from realism and moves more towards cartooning yet still keeping the detail. If we look towards animation we don't see this very much. As, in the Disnsey fashion, animated characters are all very cartoony. This is simply because it is very hard to get a room full of people to draw in the same way. Characters are kept simple and cartoony so can be drawn easily by any angle.

But if one were to take a more sophisticated aproach to light and the image it is showing you will yeild a more pleasing result. Now, nearly all cartoons are designed to have a graphic look to them. So when looking at the four types of detail revield by Darrow, Mignola, Miller, and Disney you have to appreciate the costs of making animation, that the level of detail that Darrow puts in, it would be of enormus costs to make that. Example, look at the Big Guy and Rusty TV show. Most everything was simplified. This points towards a style closer to Mignola's to show immense detail without having to show it all.

The way to approach this is you must know your character far more then you'll ever show. That you'll have model sheets that show in full turn around detail of the character, then make new model sheets with less detail to reflect the amount of light on him, then propotionitly less then less less so on untill you just have the silloette. With this you will be armed with the knowledge to have your character move from the shadows to candle lite room then an office building then raining lightning storm. The way that the shadows will fill in the cracks of details around the edges of them will imply and show just enough to tantalize audiances. Like this the same principles apply to the back ground as well.

But detail isn't just graphic line representations it's also color. But I think I'll save color for another post. This one was my first article I've ever written to be seen for a mass audience and I fear I may have been a bit to long winded and not focused on the end issue of detailed animation.

Saturday, April 7, 2007

lyca reel

I have created my lyca reel but I"m having trouble posting it, I hope I can get some help in class today.

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Thumb nails



Here are the thumb nails for my Flash project, the timing sheets and character break down (that will be used for the animation) will soon follow.

Five Channels

Five Channels

I’m approaching using the Internet, Networking, Contests, Festivals, and Web Comics for my five channels to put myself out there.
For the internet I’m planning on staying the course, working on my blog, updating it with my animation and progress and eventually making my own website to really push myself out there. I would also try to start getting into web rings and make internet friends in the industry. If I had to give myself a projected goal for making the website, I would say August.
For networking I’ve already gotten started on that. I’m already in contact with Bill Plymton, Bob Burden, Mike Allred, Mike Mignola, Rob Schrab, Gari Gianni, and a few others. Once I start producing more of my own work to share with them I will develop stronger ties and newer ones too.
I’m entering this one contest right now for world peace. hvh-worldpeace.org is the website. Basically I submit a storyboard and if I win I can animate it. I’ve been looking into more for Spelling Bee for when it’s finished. So is everyone else from my class. I’ve also been in talks with Bruce Sheridan, head of the Film & Video Department, about applying for the Fullbright Grant to New Zealand.
So far I’ve found eight festivals/contests for Spelling Bee, and everyone else is looking too. We’re really planning on putting our film out there once it’s done. Both national and international. I’ve also been thinking of ways to fund raise for the entry fees for most of these festivals; like bake sale, sponsors, and party with cover charge.
And with the web comic that goes back to making my website. I also have a few ideas for some short Flash cartoons to make as well. But basically the web comic is to readily get my work out to a wide audience so they can see what I can do. This is also why I’m waiting till August to build my website, so I can have some content built up on it when I finally launch it.

Job hunt for Devon

These are five jobs for Devon.

Famous Frames
http://www.famousframes.com/website/index.php
LA studio
5839 Green Valley Circle
Suite 104
Culver City, CA 90230 U.S.A.
T: 310.642.2721
F: 310.642.2728
NY studio
247 East 57th Street
2nd floor
New York, NY 10022
T: 212.980.7979
F: 212.980.6556
This studio specializes in concept art and animatics and story boards. I couldn’t find any listings for job openings but a company this big should be open to a fresh talent.

http://www.sbdoc.com/Home_main.html
Here is a website that has a list of advertising agencies that have a need for storyboard artist.

http://www.tribalddb.com/careers/Home/default.aspx?officeid=1
This is part of a larger advertising firm, and one of the jobs they have open is “Creative” and what I can surmise is that you work in a small team of other “Creatives” and you all are the jacks of trade working together to get the job done. They want you to do a lot of concept pre-production work. Also, this job is in Copenhagen.

http://www.ddbchi.com/news.html
DDB Chicago
200 East Randolph Street
Chicago Illinois 60601
312 552 6000
This is an advertising firm here in Chicago. They run several ads on TV, I couldn’t find the area of the site for you to apply to but they’re local so you can always set up an appointment and walk in.

http://www.theantfarm.net/
110S. Fair Fax Ave, Suit 200
Los Angles, CA 90036
TEL: 323.850.0700
This is a big advertising firm in all sorts of areas. They would definitely be looking for storyboard artist. Their site doesn’t have a hiring link but just put yourself out there.
http://www.siu.edu/~aaf/agency.html
I found another website that list advertising companies and have their web links. But a lot of them are old and don’t work (one I clicked on liked to a porn site; creepy).

http://www.am.com/am_content.html
715 Hearst Ave
Suite 300
Berkley, CA 94710
Tel-510-644-0550
This is an ad firm that would do in a pinch. They aren’t really looking right now but they do need and use storyboard artist.

Good luck.